Murray State University School of Engineering CourseWiki

Feeds and Speeds

Six key quantities connect cutting data to the machine and the cut: cutting speed, feed per tooth, spindle speed, table feed, radial engagement and axial depth.

Six quantities connect the cutting data, machine and cut

Six quantities connect the cutting data, machine and cut

Start by separating six quantities. Cutting speed and feed per tooth describe what the cutting edges should experience. Spindle speed and table feed are the corresponding machine settings. Width of cut and axial depth describe how much of the cutter is engaged. The exact starting values come from cutting data for the tool, material and operation.

Cutting speed
How fast the cutting edge moves through the material: the speed at the outside of the cutter. Written in surface feet per minute (SFM) or metres per minute (m/min). Also called surface speed. Comes from cutting data.
Feed per tooth
How far the work moves while the cutter turns from one tooth to the next, in inches or millimetres per tooth. Also called chip load, because it sets the size of the bite each tooth takes. Comes from cutting data.
Spindle speed
How many turns the cutter makes each minute, in revolutions per minute (rev/min, usually said RPM). Set on the machine.
Table feed
How fast the work moves past the cutter, in inches or millimetres per minute. Also called the feed rate. On a machine that moves the cutter instead, it is how fast the cutter travels. Set on the machine.
Width of cut, ae
The cutter’s radial engagement in the work, measured across the cutter in inches or millimetres. It is also called radial depth of cut; those names describe the same quantity, not two separate settings.
Axial depth of cut, ap
The distance engaged along the cutter’s axis, in inches or millimetres: the difference between the uncut and cut surfaces in that axial direction.

"Speeds" are the cutter turning; "feeds" are the work moving. That is all the phrase feeds and speeds means. The two are set separately on the machine, and the rest of this page is about how they depend on each other, how width and axial depth set the engaged cut, how much metal that cut removes, and the power it takes. Climb and Conventional Milling explains how feed direction relative to rotation changes the chip from thin-to-thick or thick-to-thin.

Spindle speed: the turns it takes to reach the cutting speed

Spindle speed: the turns it takes to reach the cutting speed

Cutting speed is a distance per minute, measured at the edge of the cutter. In one turn, a point on that edge travels once around the cutter: its circumference, π × D. So the spindle speed is the cutting speed divided by the distance one turn covers, once the two are in the same units.

D = 0.5 inone turn = π × D = 1.571 inIn one rotation about its center, a pointon its edge travels its circumference.
One turn of a 0.5 in cutter carries its edge 1.571 in. A cutting speed of 300 SFM asks the edge to cover 300 ft, which is 3,600 in, every minute.

Spindle speed (rev/min) = 12 × cutting speed (SFM) ÷ (π × cutter diameter in inches)

The 12 is there because cutting speed is in feet and the diameter is in inches: 12 inches to the foot. In metric units the same idea needs a 1000, millimetres to the metre:

Spindle speed (rev/min) = 1000 × cutting speed (m/min) ÷ (π × cutter diameter in mm)

Worked example, with illustrative numbers. A 0.5 in cutter, with cutting data that calls for 300 SFM: 12 × 300 ÷ (π × 0.5) = 2,292 rev/min. The 300 SFM is there to make the arithmetic concrete. It is not a recommendation for any tool or any material. The feed value below is illustrative too; use the later material guide for the carbide starting bands.

Look at where the diameter sits: underneath. Halve the diameter and the spindle speed doubles. A small cutter has to turn faster to give its edge the same cutting speed, which is why small cutters so often ask for more speed than a machine has. That case has its own card below.

Table feed: each tooth takes one chip load as it passes

Table feed: each tooth takes one chip load as it passes

Each time a tooth passes, the work should have moved one feed per tooth. The number of teeth passing each minute is the spindle speed times the number of flutes, so:

Table feed = spindle speed × flutes × feed per tooth

Worked example, continued. A 4-flute cutter at 2,292 rev/min, with a feed per tooth of 0.002 in: 2,292 × 4 × 0.002 = 18.3 in/min. The units work out on their own: turns per minute, times teeth per turn, times inches per tooth, leaves inches per minute.

Turned around, the same relation tells you what chip load a feed gives. That is the way to check a feed someone else has set:

Feed per tooth = table feed ÷ (spindle speed × flutes)

Flutes here means the teeth that actually take a chip in each turn. For an ordinary end mill that is simply the number of flutes.

Removal rate: width × depth × table feed

Removal rate: width × depth × table feed

Two more numbers describe the cut itself. The width of cut is how far the cutter reaches sideways into the work, across the direction of feed. The depth of cut is how far down its side the cutter is buried, along its axis. A side cut can be no wider than the cutter; a wider path takes more than one pass.

While the table feeds, the cutter sweeps through the work and leaves a channel behind it. In a stretch of time the cutter travels table feed × time, and the solid metal it takes out in that stretch is a slab as wide as the cut, as deep as the cut, and as long as that travel. Per minute, that is the material removal rate:

Removal rate (in³/min) = width of cut (in) × depth of cut (in) × table feed (in/min)

The front of the cut is curved, because it is the cutter’s own shape. The slab’s two ends are the same curve, one travel apart, so whatever the curve, the slab holds exactly width × depth × travel.

Worked example, continued. The same cutter, 0.1 in wide (20% of its diameter) and 0.5 in deep, at 18.3 in/min: 0.1 × 0.5 × 18.3 ≈ 0.917 in³/min, or 15.0 cm³/min. In 5 seconds the cutter travels 1.53 in and removes 0.0764 in³.

That is the volume of solid metal. Once it is chips, the same metal lies loose and takes up far more space, so the removal rate is not the size of the chip pile.

Cutting power: removal rate times the energy each cubic inch takes

Cutting power: removal rate times the energy each cubic inch takes

Cutting a cubic inch of a given material takes roughly a given amount of energy. That is its specific cutting energy, and it is why the same cut needs more power in steel than in aluminum. Written as power per unit of removal rate, it turns a removal rate straight into power:

Cutting power (hp) = removal rate (in³/min) × unit power (hp per in³/min)

Cutting power (W) = removal rate (mm³/min) × specific energy (J/mm³) ÷ 60

The 60 turns minutes into seconds, because a watt is a joule per second. One mechanical horsepower is 745.7 W.

Worked example, continued. For 6061-T6 aluminum the guide in the calculator gives a band of 0.16 to 0.30 hp per in³/min. At 0.917 in³/min that is about 0.15 to 0.28 hp, or 110 to 210 W. The same cut in 304 stainless steel, whose band is 0.65 to 1.3 hp per in³/min, needs about 0.60 to 1.2 hp.

The answer is usually a band. Some table rows give one factor; that still produces an estimate, not a measured certainty. Published bands cover a family of materials over a range of hardness, and the energy a real cut takes also depends on chip thickness and cutting-edge geometry. Treat the band as the size of the job, not a prediction to the watt.

Three different powers get called “the power”, and they are not the same:

  • Cutting power is what the cutting edge spends. That is the estimate above.
  • Motor shaft power is more, because the belts, gears and bearings between the motor and the cutter lose some on the way. If the drivetrain passes on 80% of what the motor delivers, the motor must deliver the cutting power ÷ 0.8.
  • Electrical power drawn from the supply is more again, because the motor and its drive lose some too.

None of these tells you whether a machine can take the cut. A spindle motor’s rating is not necessarily available at every speed, and power is only one limit: the tool, the holding and the machine’s stiffness are others. Use the estimate to compare cuts and to see why a cut is heavy, not to approve one.

Calculator: from material guidance to removal and power; Interactive

Calculator: from material guidance to removal and power

Choose a material to see generic carbide starting ranges for it, then enter the cutter, the cutting data and the cut. Nothing is filled in for you. Each result appears as soon as the fields it needs are filled, and says what it is still waiting for until then. Use the middle of these ranges fills in only the cutting speed and feed per tooth.

How to read the drawings. You are looking at a block of work from the front, a little above and to the right. The cutter feeds to the right along the front top edge. Gold is the solid metal removed in the time shown, drawn where it was before the cutter took it. The dashed blue curve is where the front of the cut stood when that time began; the outlined cylinder is the cutter now. The three labeled axes use the same length scale, and the drawings in one comparison share that scale, so a slab twice as long is twice the volume. The block around the cut is there only to hold it; its size means nothing. The cut is already underway when the interval starts; only the gold volume counts toward that interval.

The comparison below the drawings prices the setup’s removal rate in every material. The cut is the same in every row; only the energy per cubic inch changes.

Setup2,292 rev/min · 18.3 in/min

feeddepthwidthtravel in 5.00 s0.500 in

In 5.00 s: travel 1.53 in, removed 0.0764 in³Removal rate 0.917 in³/min · power ≈ 0.15–0.28 hp

Spindle ×2, table feed held4,584 rev/min · 18.3 in/min

feeddepthwidthtravel in 5.00 s0.500 in

In 5.00 s: travel 1.53 in, removed 0.0764 in³Removal rate 0.917 in³/min · power ≈ 0.15–0.28 hp

Spindle ×2, chip load held4,584 rev/min · 36.7 in/min

feeddepthwidthtravel in 5.00 s0.500 in

In 5.00 s: travel 3.06 in, removed 0.153 in³Removal rate 1.83 in³/min · power ≈ 0.29–0.55 hp

MaterialEstimated cutting power at 0.917 in³/min

  • 6061-T6 aluminum0.15–0.28 hp
  • 7075-T6 aluminum0.15–0.28 hp
  • 1018 mild steel0.56 hp one factor
  • 1045 steel0.56–0.59 hp
  • 4140 prehard steel0.72–0.83 hp
  • 304 stainless steel0.60–1.2 hp
  • 316 stainless steel0.60–1.2 hp
  • Class 30 gray cast iron0.40–0.60 hp
  • C360 brass0.28 hp one factor
  • Ti-6Al-4V titanium0.69–1.1 hp
The worked example, 0.5 in cutter, 0.1 in wide and 0.5 in deep, three ways over the same 5 seconds and at one scale. Doubling the spindle speed with the table feed held leaves the slab unchanged: the same metal is removed, in chips half as thick. Doubling it with the chip load held doubles the table feed, so the slab is twice as long and the removal rate and power estimate double. Below, the setup’s 0.917 in³/min priced in each material, from the guide’s cutting-energy bands.
Things to try in the calculator; Checklist

Things to try in the calculator

  • Before typing anything, read the results. Each one names the fields it is waiting for.
  • With 6061-T6 aluminum chosen, enter a 0.5 in diameter and 4 flutes, then press Use the middle of these ranges. Cutting speed and feed per tooth fill in at 400 SFM and 0.00415 in/tooth. Nothing else changes.
  • Enter a width of 0.1 in and a depth of 0.5 in. Check the removal rate against width × depth × table feed in the arithmetic.
  • Change the material to 304 stainless steel. The drawings, the table feed and the removal rate stay exactly as they were; only the power estimate moves. The guide now marks your cutting speed as above its range for stainless, but the calculator leaves your entries alone.
  • Hold the table feed and drag the spindle speed to 200%. The slab does not change and nor does the removal rate: the same metal comes off, in chips half as thick.
  • Now hold the chip load and do the same. The table feed doubles, the slab grows twice as long in the same time, and the removal rate and power estimate double.
  • Switch to metric and back. The cut and every result stay the same, written in other units, and any field you left empty stays empty.
  • Try a width larger than the diameter. The calculator refuses it: that is more than one pass.
  • Enter a 0.125 in cutter with a 4,000 rev/min machine top speed. Compare the speed the cutting speed asks for with the speed the machine can reach, and where the cutting speed actually reached sits against the guide.
When the machine cannot turn as fast as the formula asks

When the machine cannot turn as fast as the formula asks

Because small cutters ask for high spindle speeds, the formula can easily give more than a machine’s top speed. A 0.125 in cutter at 300 SFM asks for 9,167 rev/min. On a machine that stops at 4,000, it runs at 4,000.

  • Work the feed from the speed the spindle really turns. At 4,000 rev/min, with 2 flutes and 0.0008 in per tooth, that is 4,000 × 2 × 0.0008 = 6.4 in/min. Each tooth then takes the chip load you meant it to.
  • The cutting speed is what you give up. At 4,000 rev/min the edge of a 0.125 in cutter moves at π × 0.125 × 4,000 ÷ 12 = 131 SFM, not the 300 the data asked for.

Working the feed from the speed that was asked for, rather than the one the spindle is turning, gets the chip load wrong by the same ratio. A feed worked from 9,167 rev/min would give each tooth 9,167 ÷ 4,000 = 2.3 times the chip load intended.

The same applies to a machine that offers only certain speeds, through belts or gears: set the nearest speed it has, and work the feed from that one. The calculator’s machine top speed box does this for a top speed.

Generic ranges are a starting point, not your tool’s data; Watch out

Generic ranges are a starting point, not your tool’s data

What determines the surface speed?

Start with the material and its hardness, then the cutting tool. Carbide is a tool material, not one universal cutting edge: its grade, coating and geometry matter, as do coolant and how steadily the setup can cut. A harder material generally calls for a lower starting speed. Once that surface speed is chosen, the diameter determines the RPM; a smaller cutter must turn faster to reach the same surface speed.

What determines the feed per tooth?

Choose a bite the cutting edge can carry and the flute can clear. That is why the guide changes with cutter diameter: small cutters generally take smaller bites. Width and depth of cut, a full-width slot, a long tool and a flexible setup change the loading and chip clearance. The number of flutes then tells you how many of those bites happen per turn; it does not by itself choose the size of each bite. Use the diameter-based range as a starting point, with its stated engagement, and refine it from the actual tool’s cutting data.

The arithmetic on this page is exact. Its inputs are the part that takes judgement. The ranges in the calculator are generic starting bands for solid-carbide end mills, by material family, from published toolmaker tables. The cutting data for your tool comes first: normally the toolmaker’s for that tool, that material and that kind of cut, or the person responsible for the machine.

Cutting data accounts for things these formulas cannot see: the exact grade and hardness of the material, the tool’s coating and geometry, how far it reaches out of the holder, coolant, and how the setup is held. The guide’s feed-per-tooth ranges assume a side cut about 20% of the cutter’s diameter wide; a full-width slot or a long reach needs the tool’s own data. A calculator turns data into machine settings. It cannot tell you whether the data suit your cut.

Feed per tooth is not always the thickness of the chip

Feed per tooth is how far the work moves between teeth. The chip a tooth actually cuts is only that thick when the cutter is at least half buried across its diameter. In a narrower cut, each tooth meets the work at a slant and the chip comes out thinner. Climb and Conventional Milling shows this: at a width of cut of 10% of the diameter, the thickest part of the chip is 60% of the feed per tooth.

Some cutting data raises the feed per tooth for narrow cuts to make up for this. Read what your data assumes before using its numbers, and ask if it does not say. Thinner chips also take more energy per cubic inch, which is one reason a power estimate is a band.

The spindle-speed, table-feed and feed-per-tooth relations follow Sandvik Coromant’s milling formulas and definitions. The calculator’s cutting-speed and feed-per-tooth ranges are from GARR TOOL’s general purpose milling guide, and its cutting-energy bands are converted from Kennametal’s milling power factors.

Sandvik’s specific cutting-force explanation shows why chip thickness and cutting-edge geometry affect the energy estimate. Haas’s spindle power curves illustrate why available power depends on RPM; read the machine’s own curve and duty rating rather than treating its headline horsepower as available everywhere.